Debate

Why did the Sikh empire fall: British design or collapse from within?

Debate

Killings after 1839, army councils and ministers who wanted the army dispersed, set against British troop build-up from 1843 and Dalhousie's letters of 1848. What each side's evidence is.

The claim: The case that the empire fell from within, and that the British only collected it, rests on the following. Cunningham, who had served as political agent with the army in the field, writes that Lal Singh, Tej Singh and others "felt their incapacity to control the troops" and "considered that their only chance of retaining power was to have the army removed by inducing it to engage in a contest which they believed would end in its dispersion" (p. 285). The Khalsa crossed the Sutlej on 11 December 1845 (National Army Museum), and Cunningham notes that "the river had been crossed, and the treaty broken" (p. 293). Dalhousie's proclamation of 1849 said the British had kept every treaty while the Sikhs had "grossly and faithlessly violated" them (Encyclopaedia of Sikhism).

The sourced facts:

The Panthic answer: The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism does not choose between the two. Its entry on the annexation (by B. J. Hasrat) says "Internal dissensions and treachery" caused the defeat of 1846, then that Dalhousie "had meantime prepared the case for the annexation of the Punjab" and that his accusations against the Sikh government "were not sustainable factually". Henry Lawrence, the Resident at Lahore, called the annexation and the deposition of Duleep Singh "unjust and impolitic". Bhai Ajmer Singh argues that the raj was lost through betrayals when it could not have been lost otherwise, and everyone knew it, and that the killings among claimants after Maharaja Ranjit Singh left a conviction that Sikhs are undone from within. After Bhai Maharaj Singh, the last attempt, he says, the Panth settled into keeping silent and getting through the times, and endurance hardened into loyalty. The veterans who gave up their arms in March 1849 took it as an end: one, in Khushwant Singh's account, said "Aj Ranjit Singh mar gaya" (today Ranjit Singh has died).

See its connections

Sources

  1. Annexation of the Punjab (entry by B. J. Hasrat), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  2. Anglo-Sikh War I (1845-46), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala (web edition at thesikhencyclopedia.com). thesikhencyclopedia.com
  3. Anglo-Sikh War II (1848-49), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala (web edition at thesikhencyclopedia.com). thesikhencyclopedia.com
  4. Kharak Singh, Maharaja (1801-1840), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  5. Nau Nihal Singh, Kanvar (1821-1840), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  6. Sher Singh, Maharaja (1807-1843), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  7. A History of the Sikhs from the Origin of the Nation to the Battles of the Sutlej, by Joseph Davey Cunningham, pp. 285 and 293 (new and revised edition, ed. H. L. O. Garrett), Oxford University Press, 1918 (Internet Archive copy; first published 1849). archive.org
  8. Cunningham, Joseph Davey, Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, Wikisource. en.wikisource.org
  9. The Fall of the Kingdom of the Punjab, chapters 6, 7, 8 and 11, by Khushwant Singh, Orient Longmans 1962 (Penguin India digital edition 2014). apnaorg.com
  10. First Sikh War (1845-46), National Army Museum. nam.ac.uk
  11. ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਮਾਨਸਿਕ ਗੁਲਾਮੀ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੋਈ? (How did the Sikhs' mental slavery begin?), Unstoppable Punjab, YouTube. youtube.com

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.