Person

Dharam Dass Shastri

Congress MP for Karol Bagh, Delhi, in 1984; named by the Nanavati Commission

Congress MP for Karol Bagh in 1984 whom the Nanavati Commission found credible evidence against for instigating mobs in the November 1984 killings of Sikhs; he denied it and was never tried.

Dharam Dass Shastri was a Congress (I) member of Parliament at the time of the November 1984 Ghallughara, the killings of Sikhs in Delhi after Indira Gandhi's assassination. The Nanavati Commission calls him "a Congress (I) MP at the relevant time" and a Congress leader of the locality, and Wikipedia shows him winning the Karol Bagh seat in 1980; another Congress candidate won it at the next election, in December 1984. He is in this record as a named politician in the Commission's report. The statements below are findings and allegations that he denied, and no court convicted him.

Key moments

Other accounts: Lionel Baixas, in a Sciences Po study, lists Shastri among the Congress officials accused in survivors' affidavits of leading mobs, and says the Commission issued notices to him, H K L Bhagat and Kamal Nath.

Remembered for: being one of the Congress leaders whom survivors and the Nanavati Commission named, and for the long gap between those findings and any prosecution.

See its connections

Sources

  1. Nanavati Commission report, Part IV: Assessment of Evidence and Recommendations for Action (text reproduced), All About Sikhs. allaboutsikhs.com
  2. Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 were three days of furlough given to criminals by police, Congress (1 Nov 2018), Shekhar Gupta, ThePrint. theprint.in
  3. Congress was involved in 1984 anti-Sikh riots: I saw and reported it, Shekhar Gupta, ThePrint. theprint.in
  4. The Anti-Sikh Pogrom of October 31 to November 4, 1984, in New Delhi, Lionel Baixas, Sciences Po, Mass Violence and Resistance. sciencespo.fr
  5. Karol Bagh Lok Sabha constituency (members of 1980 and 1984), Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.