Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Amar Singh Ambalvi

ਅਮਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਅੰਬਾਲਵੀ

Member of the 1972 Akali Dal policy sub-committee behind the Anandpur Sahib Resolution

Named in the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism among the twelve members of the Akali Dal sub-committee set up on 11 December 1972, whose work became the Anandpur Sahib Resolution of October 1973.


Amar Singh Ambalvi was one of twelve members of a sub-committee that the Shiromani Akali Dal appointed on 11 December 1972 to proclaim afresh the programme and policies of the Dal. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, which spells his name Ambalavi, names him in its entry on the Anandpur Sahib Resolution.

The Encyclopaedia says the sub-committee followed an electoral debacle that led the Akali Dal to self-introspection. Its first meeting took place at Amritsar. The venue then shifted to Chandigarh, where the sub-committee completed its task in ten successive meetings. The working committee adopted the resulting document unanimously at Anandpur Sahib on 16 and 17 October 1973, and the Anandpur Sahib Resolution took its name from the town.

He sat on the sub-committee with Surjit Singh Barnala, Gurcharan Singh Tohra, Jiwan Singh Umranangal, Gurmeet Singh, Dr Bhagat Singh, Balwant Singh, Gian Singh Rarewala, Prem Singh Lalpura, Jaswinder Singh Brar, Bhag Singh and Major General Gurbakhsh Singh of Badhani. The Encyclopaedia says nothing more about Ambalvi himself, and we found no other source that does: not his birth, his town or his later career.

See its threads

Sources

  1. Anandpur Sahib Resolution (Maharaja Amarinder Singh), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.