Organisation

Sukerchakia Misl

Organisation

The misl of Gujranwala, one of the Dal Khalsa's fighting bands, from which Maharaja Ranjit Singh rose to found the Sarkar Khalsa.

What it was: The Sukerchakia (Sukkarchakkia) misl was one of the Sikh misls, the fighting bands of the Dal Khalsa, and the house from which Maharaja Ranjit Singh rose. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism says it took its name from the village of Sukkarchakk in today's Gujranwala district, Pakistan, and that its first known head, Budha Singh, died in 1718 with the scars of forty wounds.

How it became a misl: Naudh Singh, Budha Singh's son, fortified Sukkarchakk in 1730 and joined the Faizullapuria (Singhpuria) misl under Nawab Kapur Singh. He died in 1752 of battle wounds. His eldest son Charhat Singh then broke away from that misl and set out to win land of his own (Encyclopaedia). Wikipedia says it is unclear whether the 1748 reorganisation of the misls made the Sukerchakia independent, or whether it became so only after Charhat Singh left.

Its chiefs, in order

Key moments

Where it stands: The Encyclopaedia says Ranjit Singh went on to absorb the misls north of the Sutlej and become sovereign of the Punjab. The Sukerchakia became the ruling house of his kingdom and no longer exists as a misl.

See its connections

Sources

  1. Misls, The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  2. Charhat Singh (d. 1770), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  3. Naudh Singh (d. 1752), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  4. Ranjit Singh (1780-1839), The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (ed. Harbans Singh), Punjabi University, Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  5. Sukerchakia Misl (used for the open question of when it became independent, Charat Singh's 1774 death date and Ranjit Singh's 1792 headship), Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.