Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Justice Kuldip Singh

ਜਸਟਿਸ ਕੁਲਦੀਪ ਸਿੰਘ

1 January 1932 to 25 November 2024·Judge of the Supreme Court of India (1988 to 1996); patron member of the Committee for Coordination on Disappearances in Punjab

Supreme Court judge who treated a telegram as a habeas corpus petition for Jaswant Singh Khalra on 11 September 1995 and sat on the bench that sent the cremations case to the NHRC in 1996.


Justice Kuldip Singh was a judge of the Supreme Court of India from 14 December 1988 to 21 December 1996. For the Panth he is the judge before whom the case of Bhai Jaswant Singh Khalra's abduction came in 1995, and whose orders opened the Supreme Court's inquiry into Punjab's secret cremations. After retiring he worked with the human rights committee that documented those cases. This page follows Reduced to Ashes, the final report of that committee.

Key moments

  • 11 September 1995, five days after Khalra was abducted: Bibi Paramjit Kaur Khalra went to the SGPC, whose president, Gurcharan Singh Tohra, sent a telegram to Justice Kuldip Singh. He treated it as a habeas corpus petition and told Punjab's officials to produce Khalra or account for him within a week (p. 7).
  • 15 November 1995: on the Punjab advocate-general's request the Court directed the CBI to investigate. Justice Kuldip Singh wrote that if the facts in Khalra's press note were correct, even partially, it would be "a gory-tale of human rights violations", and that it was horrifying to visualize so many bodies cremated by the police as unidentified. The book says the order set no limit on the inquiry by territory, numbers or the way bodies were disposed of (p. 8).
  • 7 August 1996: the Court ordered Punjab to pay Rs 10 lakh as interim compensation to Khalra's widow, and called the kidnapping of a person whose family does not know if he is alive "the worst crime against humanity" (p. 10).
  • 12 December 1996: a bench of Justices Kuldip Singh and S. Saghir Ahmad asked the National Human Rights Commission to examine the matter, told the Registry to send the earlier orders and the CBI's sealed-cover reports within a week, and said any compensation the Commission awarded would be binding and payable (pp. 615 to 618).
  • 10 December 1997: the Committee for Coordination on Disappearances in Punjab (CCDP) held its first convention at Chandigarh. It asked Punjab's government to set up a truth commission, as the Akali Dal had promised in its manifesto, and resolved that a people's commission of three retired high court judges would take up the complaints if the government broke that pledge. Justice Kuldip Singh, then a former Supreme Court judge and a patron member of the CCDP, was put in charge of that initiative (p. 75).
  • 5 June 1998: he was in the CCDP delegation that met Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal to present its findings (p. 107).

The book says that six years after the Supreme Court referred the cremations to the Commission, the Commission had made no meaningful progress (p. 10). In 2002 he became chairperson of the Delimitation Commission of India, which redrew constituency boundaries after the 2001 census, according to the Wikipedia article on him and DeshGujarat.

Remembered for: a telegram turned into a petition within days of Khalra's abduction, and an order that put no limit on how far the CBI could look.

See its threads

Sources

  1. Reduced to Ashes: The Insurgency and Human Rights in Punjab, Final Report: Volume One (Ram Narayan Kumar with Amrik Singh, Ashok Agrwaal and Jaskaran Kaur), pp. 7 to 10, 75, 107, 615 to 618, South Asia Forum for Human Rights, Kathmandu, 2003. archive.org
  2. Kuldip Singh (judge) (dates of birth, Supreme Court service and death; used because nothing better loaded), Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
  3. Sharing the final delimitation order of Gujarat, and its background (12 August 2012), DeshGujarat. deshgujarat.com

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.