Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Dar Commission rejects linguistic provinces for now

ਦਰ ਕਮਿਸ਼ਨ ਨੇ ਫ਼ਿਲਹਾਲ ਬੋਲੀ ਦੇ ਆਧਾਰ ਉੱਤੇ ਸੂਬੇ ਬਣਾਉਣ ਤੋਂ ਨਾਂਹ ਕੀਤੀ

·Partition Aftermath

A three-man commission on new provinces for Andhra, Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra advised against forming provinces mainly on language; its principles were later cited against Punjabi Suba.


Who: Three Commissioners named by the President of the Constituent Assembly: S. K. Dar, a retired judge of the Allahabad High Court, as Chairman, with Dr Panna Lall and Jagat Narain Lal; B. C. Banerji was Secretary. Associate members from the regions concerned sat with them but did not sign the report.

What: By a notification dated 17 June 1948 the Commission was asked to report on whether to form new provinces of Andhra, Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra, on their boundaries and on the financial and administrative consequences. The Parliamentary Committee on the demand for Punjabi Suba later gave the date as a Government of India order of 19 June 1948. The Commission held its first meeting on 19 July 1948 and toured Vizagapatam, Madras, Madura, Mangalore, Calicut, Coimbatore, Nagpur, Hubli, Poona and Bombay. About 1,000 written memoranda were received and over 700 witnesses heard. The report, signed on 10 December 1948, is unanimous.

It concluded that the formation of provinces on exclusively or even mainly linguistic considerations was not in the larger interests of the Indian nation and should not be taken in hand, and that no new provinces from those referred to it should be formed for the present. Language could be one factor among others but not the decisive or main one. It said the first and last need of India was to be made a nation. Among the weaknesses of the demand it listed that recognising a province governed by a linguistic group paved the way for other group governments, naming government by Southerners in the South, "government by Sikhs and Jats in the north of India" and government by non-Brahmins.

Where: New Delhi, where it met, with tours of cities in the south and west.

Why it mattered: The Punjab was not in its terms. The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism says that "it seems" northern India was deliberately kept out of the purview of the commission so that problems like those of Punjab, and issues pertaining to Sikhs, would not arise. Soon after the report, the Congress appointed the J.V.P. Committee at its Jaipur session in December 1948 to review the position in the light of it. The Commission's principles came back when Sikhs demanded a Punjabi-speaking State: in 1955 the States Reorganisation Commission wrote that the Dar Commission had rightly said no linguistic State should be imposed on substantial minorities, and rejected the Punjabi-speaking State for lack of general support. The 1966 Parliamentary Committee recalled that the Dar Commission named "administrative convenience" and "homogeneity of language" as the two principles for new States.

Read it on the timelineSee its threads

Sources

  1. Report of the Linguistic Provinces Commission (Constituent Assembly of India), 1948: paras 2, 129, 147 and 152, Appendix I, Government of India Press, New Delhi, 1948. archive.org
  2. Report of the States Reorganisation Commission, 1955: paras 58 to 61 and 539 to 540, Government of India, 1955. archive.org
  3. Report of the Parliamentary Committee on Demand for Punjabi Suba, 1966: paras 15 and 66, Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, 1966. archive.org
  4. Punjabi Suba Movement (Karnail Singh Doad), Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University Patiala. eos.learnpunjabi.org

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.