Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Canada's Continuous Journey Regulation shuts out Indian immigration

ਕੈਨੇਡਾ ਦਾ ਲਗਾਤਾਰ ਸਫ਼ਰ ਦਾ ਨਿਯਮ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਪਰਵਾਸ ਨੂੰ ਬੰਦ ਕਰ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ

·Annexation to Partition

Canada's order of 8 January 1908 barred immigrants who did not come by a continuous journey from their homeland. No ship sailed that route from India, so it shut out Indians without naming them.


Who: The Government of Canada, acting on a report by William Lyon Mackenzie King, then Deputy Minister of Labour, according to Pier 21, the Canadian Museum of Immigration. Those shut out were immigrants from India: South Asian Canadian Heritage says about 5,000 South Asians had settled in British Columbia by 1908, about 90 percent Sikh.

What: On 8 January 1908 an order in council barred any immigrant who, in the opinion of the Minister of the Interior, did not come by a continuous journey from the country of birth or citizenship, or on a ticket bought before leaving it, according to Wikipedia. It named no race and no country, but no ship sailed directly from India to Canada, so it blocked Indian immigration (Pier 21). Wikipedia adds that London warned Canada of possible nationalist anger in India, so officials chose to halt Indian immigration indirectly. The Sikh Heritage Museum of Canada says they also pressured the Canadian Pacific Steamship Company to end its service from India.

A second rule required Asian immigrants to hold $200. The museum says white immigrants needed only $25, and Canadian Sikh Heritage says $20. Wikipedia dates that order to 3 June 1908. The courts pushed back at first: on 24 March 1908 Justice Clement quashed the deportation orders of 105 Calcutta passengers of the SS Monteagle, because the Act did not authorise the Minister's decision. Parliament amended the Act on 10 April 1908, and a new Immigration Act in 1910 came with both rules reissued.

  • November 1913: in the Panama Maru case Chief Justice Gordon Hunter ruled both orders invalid, and Ottawa reissued them in January 1914.
  • 1914: Gurdit Singh chartered the Komagata Maru to test the rule, and only 22 of its 376 passengers were allowed to land, according to the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism.
  • 1919: wives and children under eighteen were allowed in.
  • 1921 and 1947: the $200 order was repealed on 25 July 1921 and the continuous journey order revoked on 26 November 1947, according to Wikipedia.

Where: Made in Ottawa and enforced at Canada's ports, above all Vancouver and Victoria on the Pacific coast.

Why it mattered: The rule ended Indian immigration for decades. Wikipedia's account of the 1907 violence says 2,623 Indian and South Asian immigrants entered Canada in 1907 to 1908 and six in 1908 to 1909, and Pier 21 says only 112 Indian immigrants entered between 1910 and 1920. Men could not bring their families: Canadian Sikh Heritage says only nine Punjabi women came to British Columbia between 1904 and 1920. Pier 21 says Canada's continuous journey rule responded to anti-Asian sentiment after the Vancouver violence of September 1907.

Read it on the timelineSee its threads

Sources

  1. Continuous Journey Regulation, 1908, Pier 21, Canadian Museum of Immigration. pier21.ca
  2. History of South Asians in Canada: Timeline, South Asian Canadian Heritage. southasiancanadianheritage.ca
  3. Sikh Heritage Museum of Canada timeline, Sikh Heritage Museum of Canada. shmc.ca
  4. Passage to Canada, Canadian Sikh Heritage. canadiansikhheritage.ca
  5. Komagata Maru (entry by Emily C. Brown), Encyclopaedia of Sikhism. eos.learnpunjabi.org
  6. "Immigration Act a weapon": Panama Maru and the exclusion of immigrants, 1913, Pier 21, Canadian Museum of Immigration. pier21.ca
  7. Continuous journey regulation (used for the wording, the Monteagle case, the dates of the $200 order and of its repeal, where nothing better loaded), Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
  8. 1907 Vancouver anti-Asian riots (used only for the arrival figures of 1907 to 1909), Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.