Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Roshan Singh of Sultanpuri

ਸੁਲਤਾਨਪੁਰੀ ਦਾ ਰੌਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ

2 November 1984·Sikh of B Block, Sultanpuri, Delhi; killed on 2 November 1984 according to his father's evidence

Sultanpuri Sikh named in a reward and, according to his father Moti Singh's evidence to the Nanavati Commission, shot by Station House Officer Bhatti at about 6 a.m. on 2 November 1984.


Roshan Singh was a Sikh of B Block in Sultanpuri, West Delhi, who was killed on the morning of 2 November 1984 in the Tesra Ghallughara, according to the evidence of his father as the Nanavati Commission summarises it. He was the son of Moti Singh, who lived in B Block of Sultanpuri. The account below is his father's, not a finding of a court.

What his father said

  • 1 November 1984, about 8.30 a.m.: Sajjan Kumar, then the local Member of Parliament, told a mob near B Block that whoever killed Roshan Singh or Bhag Singh would be given Rs 5,000, and those who killed other Sikhs Rs 1,000 "per head".
  • 2 November 1984, about 6 a.m.: when a mob that had come near the house started going elsewhere, Roshan Singh tried to run to safety. By the time he was two steps from the house, Station House Officer Bhatti (spelt Bhati in the report) fired at him from his revolver, saying that no Sikh could get away alive while he was there.
  • A grandson of Moti Singh who went out to help was shot dead by Head Constable Jai Chand, and another grandson was wounded. About 15 minutes later, Moti Singh said, Brahmanand Gupta brought kerosene in a bucket and set the bodies ablaze.

Ensaaf, which also draws on Moti Singh's affidavit, has both grandsons killed, and says three other members of the family died. The Commission's summary of the Sultanpuri police station area says that police forced Sikhs to go inside their houses and then let the mobs attack them.

What the Commission did about the men named. It issued notices to Sajjan Kumar and Brahmanand Gupta. Of Bhatti it said his explanation that the area was very large and the force inadequate "is not a good explanation", but recommended no action against him because of the long lapse of time and weak evidence.

Why his name is on record: his father's evidence names him first as one of the two men for whose killing a reward was offered, and then as the first of the family to be shot on 2 November.

See its threads

Sources

  1. Justice Nanavati Commission of Inquiry (1984 Anti-Sikh Riots), Report, Volume I, pp. 114 to 116 and 168 to 169, Government of India, hosted by the Delhi High Court. delhihighcourt.nic.in
  2. Twenty Years of Impunity: The November 1984 Pogroms of Sikhs in India (Jaskaran Kaur), 2nd edition, p. 28, Ensaaf, 2006. 1984sikh-archive.org

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.