Sikhitihasਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ

Nathu Pradhan

ਨੱਥੂ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ

Man of Sultanpuri, Delhi, named by witnesses as a leader of mobs in November 1984; dead before the Nanavati Commission issued its notices

Sultanpuri man named by many survivors as a mob leader in November 1984; the Nanavati Commission wrote that the evidence showed he took part in some incidents, but he had died before its notices.


Nathu Pradhan (also spelt Nathu Pardhan and Nathu Pradan in the records) was a man of Sultanpuri in West Delhi whom many survivors named as a leader of the mobs that attacked Sikhs on 1 and 2 November 1984. He is known only from survivors' accounts and from two official records. He was not heard by the Nanavati Commission, which wrote that he "had died earlier".

What the records say

  • 14 October 1987: the Jain-Banerjee Committee wrote to the Additional Commissioner of Police that an affidavit by Anwar Kaur disclosed cognizable offences against Sajjan Kumar, Nathu Pardhan, Brahma Nand Gupta and others, and asked for cases to be registered at Sultanpuri police station.
  • The Nanavati Commission's report summarises the survivors' affidavits for Sultanpuri. Sumer Singh, Manbari Kaur, Chal Kaur and others said that Nathu Pradhan, Jai Bhagwan and others led one mob. Padmi Kaur said the mob was led by Brahmanand Gupta, Uddal and Nathu Pradhan. On the events of 2 November, Ramesh Kaur named Nathu Pradan and another man as leading the mob, and Ghuddi Kaur said that Omi, Nathu Pradhan and Brahmanand Gupta killed her husband by pouring kerosene on him. One woman survivor said that he and two others stripped her and raped her.
  • Moti Singh said that at the meeting on the morning of 1 November Nathu Pradhan and a Congress (I) worker named Bharti said they would kill Sikhs.
  • The Commission's finding for the West District was that the evidence disclosed that Sajjan Kumar and Brahmanand Gupta, the two Congress (I) leaders, and Nathu Pradhan "had taken part in some of those incidents". Section 8B notices were issued to Kumar and Gupta, but none to Nathu Pradhan because he had died earlier.

All of this is what witnesses said and what the Commission read from their evidence. Because he died before he could answer, the Commission did not hear him, and the sources opened give no court finding on him.

See its threads

Sources

  1. Justice Nanavati Commission of Inquiry (1984 Anti-Sikh Riots), Report, Volume I, pp. 111 to 112, 114 to 115 and 168, Government of India, hosted by the Delhi High Court. delhihighcourt.nic.in
  2. Report of the Jain-Aggarwal Committee (1993), chapter 2, para 2.5, Delhi Administration, hosted by the 1984 Sikh Archive. 1984sikh-archive.org

I know how they're connected

Tell us how these two are connected and where it is written. The site's owner reviews every contribution before anything is published; nothing goes live on its own.

What you send is kept only to review the connection. Claims about living people and about 1984 always get the owner's own review.

Suggest a correction

Found something wrong? Tell us what should change, link a source that shows it, and say why that source is right.

What you send is kept only to review the correction. Your email is never published.